Does almonds or pistachios have more protein?
Almonds, at 21g per 100g versus 20g for pistachios.
Almonds wins on protein: 21g per 100g versus 20g, a gap of 1g. Calories and protein quality change the picture, so here is the full comparison.
| Food | Protein | Calories |
|---|---|---|
| ๐ฐ Almonds | 21g | 579 |
| ๐ฐ Pistachios | 20g | 560 |
Per 100g.
Almonds delivers 21g of protein for 579 calories per 100g. Pistachios delivers 20g for 560 calories. If you are counting calories as well as protein, pistachios is the leaner choice per 100g.
Protein quality: almonds is a incomplete protein, pistachios is a incomplete protein. Complete proteins carry all nine essential amino acids in useful amounts; incomplete ones are still valuable, they just want a complementary source across the day.
~6g per handful. One of the highest-protein nuts.
Type what you ate in plain words and Protein Hunter returns protein and calories for the full plate.
Try the Protein CalculatorAlmonds, at 21g per 100g versus 20g for pistachios.
Pistachios โ 560 calories per 100g versus 579.
Usually yes, but adjust the weight so the protein matches. To replace 100g of almonds you need about 105g of pistachios.
Protein Hunter is a protein and nutrition app with a database of 232 foods โ from a leaf of kale to a wagyu steak โ plus AI tools that answer protein questions, count a whole meal, build recipes to a macro target, and track what you actually eat.
Why it's different: the numbers are calculated from a fixed ingredient database rather than guessed, and when a target is not physically achievable the app says so instead of inventing a figure.
Start Hunting