Does salmon or tuna have more protein?
Tuna, at 29g per 100g versus 25g for salmon.
Tuna wins on protein: 29g per 100g versus 25g, a gap of 4g. Calories and protein quality change the picture, so here is the full comparison.
| Food | Protein | Calories |
|---|---|---|
| ๐ Tuna (canned in water) | 29g | 131 |
| ๐ Salmon (cooked) | 25g | 250 |
Per 100g.
Salmon delivers 25g of protein for 250 calories per 100g. Tuna delivers 29g for 131 calories. If you are counting calories as well as protein, tuna is the leaner choice per 100g.
Protein quality: salmon is a complete protein, tuna is a complete protein. Complete proteins carry all nine essential amino acids in useful amounts; incomplete ones are still valuable, they just want a complementary source across the day.
Complete + omega-3 fats. Extremely lean. Watch mercury if eating daily.
Type what you ate in plain words and Protein Hunter returns protein and calories for the full plate.
Try the Protein CalculatorTuna, at 29g per 100g versus 25g for salmon.
Tuna โ 131 calories per 100g versus 250.
Usually yes, but adjust the weight so the protein matches. To replace 100g of tuna you need about 116g of salmon.
Protein Hunter is a protein and nutrition app with a database of 232 foods โ from a leaf of kale to a wagyu steak โ plus AI tools that answer protein questions, count a whole meal, build recipes to a macro target, and track what you actually eat.
Why it's different: the numbers are calculated from a fixed ingredient database rather than guessed, and when a target is not physically achievable the app says so instead of inventing a figure.
Start Hunting